Protein Folding MAE
Description
No current state-of-the-art protein-folding algorithm can predict side-chain conformations with a mean absolute error below 0.5 Å across all twenty amino acids without energy-based refinement.
Falsification Criteria
Present benchmarking data where an algorithm meets or surpasses this accuracy without energy refinement steps.
AI Feedback
1. Brief critique and context: The conjecture focuses on the challenge of predicting side-chain conformations in protein folding, a critical aspect for accurate molecular modeling. Traditional methods often rely on energy-based refinement to improve accuracy, and achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) below 0.5 Å for all amino acids without such refinement is considered difficult. This sets a high bar, reflecting the complex interplay of forces and sterics in proteins.
2. Recent research: Recent advances in AI-driven algorithms, like AlphaFold by DeepMind, have significantly improved protein structure predictions (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03819-2). However, these models still rely on energy-based post-processing to refine side-chain conformations. Newer models like RosettaFold (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abj8754) show promise but also incorporate energy-based refinement in their pipeline.
3. Bayesian likelihood of falsification: 30%. While deep learning models have rapidly advanced in accuracy and capability, the precise prediction of side-chain conformations without energy refinement remains a significant hurdle. Given the current trajectory of research, it's plausible that breakthroughs could occur, but the specific constraints of the conjecture make it less likely to be fully falsified within five years.
Bounty
Contribute to the bounty for anyone who can successfully refute this conjecture
You must be signed in to contribute to the bounty.
Sign inRefutations
Rational criticism and counterarguments to this conjecture
No refutations have been submitted yet.
Be the first to provide rational criticism for this conjecture.
You must be signed in to submit a refutation.
Sign in
Sign in to join the discussion.